基于 DEMATEL-ISM 模型的航站楼安全韧性影响因素分析

taptap下载安装安卓学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 52-57.

基于 DEMATEL-ISM 模型的航站楼安全韧性影响因素分析

taptap下载安装安卓 a. 民航热灾害防控与应急重点实验室；b. 安全科学与工程学院，天津

300300

收稿日期:2024-02-26 修回日期:2024-04-27 出版日期:2025-05-14 发布日期:2025-05-14
作者简介:宋洋（1977— ），男，天津人，教授，博士，研究方向为民航基建项目建设风险分析与管理.
基金资助:
民航热灾害防控与应急重点实验室开放基金项目（RZH2022-KF-04）

Analysis of factors affecting terminal safety resilience based on

DEMATEL-ISM model

a. Key Laboratory of Civil Aviation Thermal Hazards Prevention and Emergency Response;

b. College of Safety Science and Engineering, CAUC, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2024-02-26 Revised:2024-04-27 Online:2025-05-14 Published:2025-05-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为促进航站楼安全韧性建设，提高航站楼安全管理水平，将“安全韧性”概念引入航站楼安全管理，利用集

成决策实验室分析（DEMATEL，decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory）和解释结构模型（ISM，interpretative structural model）方法来分析航站楼安全韧性的影响因素。首先，提出航站楼安全韧性定义，以随其

运营表现出的监测能力、抵抗能力、应急能力、恢复能力为核心构建航站楼安全韧性影响因素指标体系；然

后，建立 DEMATEL-ISM 模型，使用 DEMATEL 方法计算各因素的影响度、被影响度、中心度、原因度以及

因素间的因果属性，利用 ISM 方法划分其层级结构；最后，以国内某机场 A 航站楼为例进行模型验证。结

果表明：航站楼安全韧性的根本影响因素是建立航站楼安全韧性机制，与 A 航站楼实际运营情况一致，验

证了模型的有效性和可靠性，为航站楼安全管理提供决策和理论支持。

关键词:

航站楼, 安全韧性, 决策实验室分析（DEMATEL）, 解释结构模型（ISM）

Abstract:

To promote the construction of terminal safety resilience and improve the level of terminal safety management, the

concept of "safety resilience" is introduced into terminal safety management, and the factors affecting the safety resilience of the terminal are analyzed using the integrated method of decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory

(DEMATEL) and interpretative structural model (ISM). Firstly, the definition of terminal safety resilience is proposed, and the indicator system of terminal safety resilience influencing factors is constructed centered on the monitoring ability, resistance ability, emergency response ability and recovery ability demonstrated with its operation.

Then, the DEMATEL-ISM model is established, and the DEMATEL method is used to calculate the degree of influence, the degree of being influenced, the degree of center, the degree of cause, and the causal attributes between

the factors, and the ISM method is used to divide their hierarchical structure. Finally, Terminal A of a domestic airport is taken as an example for model validation. The results indicate that the fundamental influencing factor of terminal safety resilience is the establishment of a terminal safety resilience mechanism, which is consistent with the

actual operation of Terminal A. This validates the effectiveness and reliability of the model and provides decision making and theoretical support for terminal safety management.

Key words:

terminal, safety resilience, decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), interpretative structural

model (ISM)

中图分类号:

V351

宋洋 a, 王瑞琪 b, 张鹏b.

基于 DEMATEL-ISM 模型的航站楼安全韧性影响因素分析

[J]. taptap下载安装安卓学报, 2025, 43(2): 52-57.

SONG Yang a , WANG Ruiqi b , ZHANG Peng b.

Analysis of factors affecting terminal safety resilience based on

DEMATEL-ISM model

[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2025, 43(2): 52-57.

参考文献 22

	[1]
	HOLLNAGEL E, LEONHARDT J, LICU T, et al． From safety-Ⅰ to
	safety-Ⅱ: a white paper[R]． Brussels: Eurocontrol, 2013.
[2]	齐晓云, 李文磊, 刘杰．考虑非适应性疏散行为的航站楼应急疏
散[J]	．科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(7): 3106-3114．
[3]	史跃亚, 孙唯, 黄江涛．基于博弈理论的航站楼安检区疏散仿真
	优化[J]．计算机仿真, 2022, 39(7): 48-53．
	[4]
	HOLLNAGEL E． Is safety a subject for science?[J]． Safety Science, 2014,
	67: 21-24．
[5]	黄弘, 范维澄．构建“安全韧性城市”：概念、理论与实施路径[J]．北
	京行政学院学报, 2024(2): 1-9．
	[6]
	ADJETEY-BAHUN K, BIRREGAH B, CH魦TELET E, et al． A model to
	quantify the resilience of mass railway transportation systems [J]．
	Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2016, 153: 1-14．
[7]	汪洋, 黄金辉, 付姗姗, 等．系统安全的思维转型: 风险与韧性的
	比较研究[J]．中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(1): 62-68．
[8]	黄浪, 吴超, 杨冕, 等．韧性理论在安全科学领域中的应用[J]．
	中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(3): 1-6．
[9]	黄浪, 吴超, 王秉．系统安全韧性的塑造与评估建模[J]．中国
	安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(12): 15-21．
[10]	罗通元．安全韧性学基本概念和理论体系探讨[J]．安全与环境学报,
	2022, 22(1): 280-291．
[11]	RANASINGHE U, JEFFERIES M, DAVIS P, et al． Resilience engineer－
	ing indicators and safety management: a systematic review[J]． Safety and
	Health at Work, 2020, 11(2): 127-135．
[12]	郭九霞．新一代民航运输系统安全韧性理论与方法研究[D]．成都:
	电子科技大学, 2021．
[13]	ZHU Z, YUAN J F, SHAO Q H, et al． Developing key safety manage－
	ment factors for construction projects in China: a resilience perspective
[J]	． International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,
	2020, 17(17): 6167．
[14]	TANG B, GUO S Y, LI J C, et al． Exploring the risk transmission char－
	acteristics among unsafe behaviors within urban railway construction ac－
	cidents[J]． Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2022, 28(6):
	443-456．
[15]	詹承豫, 高叶, 徐明婧．系统韧性: 一个统筹发展与安全的核心概
念[J]	．广州大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 21(4): 17-32．
[16]	王欠欠．工程项目安全管理弹性水平评价及提升策略研究[D]．郑州:
	郑州大学, 2021．
[17]	卞斌彬, 黄玉庆, 刘志坚, 等. 基于双重预防机制的安全评价指标体
	系构建[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(S1): 45-50.
[18]	GABUS A, FONTELA E. World problem, an invitation to further thought
	within the framework of DEMATEL[M]. Geneva: Battelle Institute, Geneva Research Center, 1972．
[19]	黄亚江, 李书全, 李益锌, 等．基于 DEMATEL-ISM-ANP 的地铁运
	营安全韧性综合评价[J]．中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(6): 171-177．
[20]	岳仁田, 韩亚雄．航空公司安全风险因素分析的 DEMATEL-ISM 模
	型研究[J]．安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(6): 2091-2097．
[21]	李维昌．韧性视角下关系治理对建设项目绩效的影响研究[D]．济南:
	山东建筑大学, 2022．
[22]	詹承豫, 徐培洋．基于系统韧性的大安全大应急框架: 概念逻辑与
	建设思路[J]．中国行政管理, 2023, 39(8): 137-144．