考虑全飞行阶段的防冰严酷工况确定及验证

taptap下载安装安卓学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 11-19.

考虑全飞行阶段的防冰严酷工况确定及验证

胡雪兰，王艺丹，牛一凡，姚佳伟

taptap下载安装安卓中欧航空工程师学院，天津 300300

收稿日期:2024-04-01 修回日期:2024-06-04 出版日期:2025-04-09 发布日期:2025-04-09
作者简介:胡雪兰（1982— ），女，山东济宁人，教授，博士，研究方向为复合材料电热除冰数值分析
基金资助:
中国民用航空局安全能力建设基金项目（ASSA2022/11）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项自然科学类重点项目（3122020082）

Determination and verification of severe anti-icing working conditions

during the entire flight phase

HU Xuelan, WANG Yidan, NIU Yifan, YAO Jiawei

Sino-European Institute of Aviation Engineering, CAUC, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2024-04-01 Revised:2024-06-04 Online:2025-04-09 Published:2025-04-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

确定满足适航要求的严酷工况是机翼结冰适航审定过程中的必要环节，传统的防冰严酷工况计算方法需

要大量重复计算，因此，本文结合拉丁超立方抽样和严酷评估指数提出了一种基于 CCAR-25 附录 C（简称

附录 C）的考虑全飞行阶段、全冰积聚条件确定严酷工况的简化方法，并利用计算流体力学模型验证其可

行性。首先，基于附录 C 明确了结冰工况参数区间，利用拉丁超立方抽样实现了连续参数区间的离散化，获

得组合工况；其次，引入严酷评估指数，对结冰工况进行排序，并通过单变量结冰条件及连续最大结冰条件

下机翼结冰的计算流体力学仿真计算，验证了在相同冰型下该严酷评估指数可以以结冰量（包括结冰总质

量和最大结冰厚度）作为评价指标，用于严酷程度评估，证明了其绝对值越大，工况越严酷；等待阶段由于

飞行时间远大于其他飞行阶段，导致其结冰严酷程度最高，严酷工况均在等待阶段；最后，通过本文提出的

严酷工况确定方法给出了基于附录 C 的严酷工况。

关键词:

严酷工况, 拉丁超立方抽样, 严酷评估指数, 机翼结冰, 适航

Abstract:

Determining the severe working conditions that meet the airworthiness requirements is a necessary step in the airworthiness certification process of wing icing, and traditional calculation methods of severe anti-icing working

conditions require a large amount of repetitive calculations, therefore, this article proposes a simplified method for

determining severe working conditions based on Appendix C of CCAR-25 (Appendix C) by combining Latin hypercube sampling and severity assessment index, considering the entire flight phase and full ice accumulation

conditions, and its feasibility is verified by computational fluid dynamics model. Firstly, based on Appendix C, the

parameter intervals for icing working conditions were clarified, and Latin hypercube sampling was used to discrete

the continuous parameter intervals and obtain the combined working conditions. Secondly, the severity assessment

index is introduced to rank the icing working conditions, and the computational fluid dynamics simulation calculation of wing icing under univariate icing working conditions and continuous maximum icing working conditions is

used to verify that the severity assessment index can be used as an evaluation index for severity assessment under

the same ice type, with the amount of icing (including the total mass of icing and the maximum icing thickness). It is

proved that the larger the absolute value, the more severe the working working conditions. Due to the significantly

longer flight time compared to other flight phases, the waiting phase has the highest degree of icing severity, and all

severe working conditions are in the waiting phase. Finally, the severe condition based on Appendix C are given by

the severe condition determination method proposed in this paper.

Key words:

severe conditions, Latin hypercube sampling, severity assessment index, wing icing, airworthiness

中图分类号:

V221.8

胡雪兰, 王艺丹, 牛一凡, 姚佳伟.

考虑全飞行阶段的防冰严酷工况确定及验证

[J]. taptap下载安装安卓学报, 2025, 43(1): 11-19.

HU Xuelan, WANG Yidan, NIU Yifan, YAO Jiawei.

Determination and verification of severe anti-icing working conditions

during the entire flight phase

[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2025, 43(1): 11-19.

参考文献 35

[1]	高郭池, 张波, 全敬泽, 等. 正常类飞机自然结冰试飞适航审定技
术[J]	航空学报, 2024, 45(1): 188-209.
[2]	申晓斌, 赵文朝, 林贵平, 等. 飞机结冰中水滴撞击特性的欧拉法准
	确性分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2023, 49(8): 1912-1921.
[3]	刘通. 飞机表面结冰与防冰数值模拟方法研究[D]. 西安: 西北工
	业大学, 2020.
	[4]
	MA L S, SONG H, CHEN Y, et al. A numerical simulation of the distri－
	bution and the variation law of the liquid water content in icing wind
	tunnel[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2024, 236: 121539.
[5]	中国民用航空局. 运输类飞机适航标准: CCAR-25-R4—2011[S].
	北京: 中国民用航空局, 2011.
	[6]
	FAA. Airworthiness standards: transport category airplanes for flight in
	icing conditions: FAA-AC -25-27[S]. Los Angeles: FAA, 2004.
[7]	赵克良. 大型民机结冰计算、风洞试验及试飞验证[D]. 南京: 南京航
	空航天大学, 2017.
[8]	朱东宇, 张付昆, 裴如男, 等. 临界冰形确定方法及其对气动特性影
	响研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2016, 34(6): 714-720.
[9]	倪章松, 刘森云, 张军, 等. 环境参数对飞机防冰热载荷的影响规
律[J]	航空动力学报, 2021, 36(1): 8-14.
[10]	姜萍. 飞行器热气防冰系统数值模拟与设计[D]. 南京: 南京航空
	航天大学, 2018.
[11]	YEOMAN K． Selection of the critical icing/flight case for an unprotected
	airfoil[C]//27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, January 09-12, 1989, Reno,
	NV． Reston, Virginia: AIAA, 1989: 757.
[12]	MILLER D, POTAPCZUK M, LANGHALS T． Preliminary investigation
	of ice shape sensitivity to parameter variations[C]//43th AIAA Aerospace
	Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 10-13, 2005, Reno, Nevada． Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2005: 73.
[13]	林贵平, 卜雪琴, 申晓斌, 等. 飞机结冰与防冰技术[M]. 北京: 北京航
	空航天大学出版社, 2016.
[14]	AIRBUS. 飞行技术之性能资料: 掌握飞机性能[G]. Blagnac: AIRBUS,
	2002.
[15]	张一山. 基于性能软件的起飞定量安全裕度研究[D]. 广汉: 中国民
	用航空飞行学院, 2022.
[16]	李庆庆. 飞机机翼结冰过程数值模拟及气动特性分析[D]. 汉中: 陕
	西理工大学, 2022.
[17]	PRINCE RAJ L, LEE J W, MYONG R S. Ice accretion and aerodynamic
	effects on a multi-element airfoil under SLD icing conditions[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 85: 320-333.
[18]	王起达. 结冰后飞机的纵向稳定性和操纵性研究[D]. 南京: 南京航
	空航天大学, 2009.
[19]	李瑜. 基于 Szilder 随机运动模型的飞机结冰数值模拟研究[D].
	南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2019.
[20]	涂诗晨. 区域管制高度分配辅助决策技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空
	航天大学, 2021.
[21]	中国民用航空局. 关于加强航空器空中等待程序应用的通告: AC-
	115-TM-2014-02[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2014.
[22]	中国民用航空局. 目视和仪表飞行程序设计规范: AC-97-FS-0051R1
[S]	北京: 中国民用航空局, 2021.
[23]	CABLER S J M. Aircraft ice protection[R]. Los Angeles: FAA, 2006.
[24]	高郭池, 丁丽, 李保良, 等. 气动除冰类飞机结冰风洞试验适航审
	定技术[J]. 实验流体力学, 2019, 33(2): 85-94.
[25]	BURICK R A, RYAN R J. FAA certification of the Lockheed Martin C-
	130J transport ice protection system[C]//24th Atmospheric Flight Me－
	chanics Conference, August 09-11, 1999, Portland, OR． Reston, Vir－
	ginia: AIAA, 1999: 4016．
[26]	冯丽娟. 民用飞机结冰适航取证严重结冰条件的确定方法[J]. 中国
	科技信息, 2014(15): 170-172.
[27]	陈红英, 向小军. 民用飞机实际着陆距离计算方法研究[J]. 计算机仿
	真, 2013, 30(9): 66-69.
[28]	MCKAY M D, BECKMAN R J, CONOVER W J. A comparison of three
	methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output
	from a computer code[J]. Technometrics, 2000, 42(1): 55-61.
[29]	林丽. 风挡防冰严酷设计状态的选取[J]. 航空科学技术, 2014, 25
(6)	: 51-53.
[30]	DIAZ J A R. NACA0012 Airfoil Analysis[EB/OL]. (2018-02-14)[2023-
	10-30]. https://www.academia.edu/36025651/NACA_0012_Airfoil_Analysis.
[31]	李宏林, 王毅. 机翼表面水滴撞击特性计算[C]//中国力学学会论
	文集. 郑州: 力学与工程应用, 2016: 402-405.
[32]	任靖豪, 王强, 刘宇, 等. 大型商用运输机机翼增升构型水滴撞
	击特性计算[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2021, 39(1): 52-58, 72.
[33]	易贤. 飞机积冰的数值计算与积冰试验相似准则研究[D]. 绵阳: 中
	国空气动力研究与发展中心, 2007.
[34]	邵晓海. 数值模拟机翼结冰及其对飞行安全的影响[D]. 南京: 南京
	航空航天大学, 2015.
[35]	韩王超. 机翼热气防冰系统严酷状态点确定方法研究[C]//飞机机电
	系统理论与实践: 第二届民用飞机机电系统国际论坛论文集, 西安,
	2015: 169-174.