民用飞机安全性分析中单点失效MTBF 的算法

taptap下载安装安卓学报

民用飞机安全性分析中单点失效MTBF 的算法

杨可^a，赵长啸^b

（taptap下载安装安卓a.工程技术训练中心；b.适航审定研究中心，天津300300）

收稿日期:2016-01-13 修回日期:2016-04-05 出版日期:2016-08-26 发布日期:2016-10-13
作者简介:杨可（1985冥），女，湖北宜城人，助教，硕士，研究方向为民用航空器维修、系统安全性分析.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（U1533105）

Single failure MTBF analysis on aircraft safety assessment

YANG Ke^a, ZHAO Changxiao^b

(a. Engineering Techniques Training Center; b. Airworthiness Certification Technology Research & Management Center, CAUC, Tianjin 300300, China)

Received:2016-01-13 Revised:2016-04-05 Online:2016-08-26 Published:2016-10-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

安全是民航工业的生命线。按照适航规章要求，任何妨碍飞机继续安全飞行与着陆的单点失效的出现是极不可能的。传统的参数，如平均故障间隔时间（MTBF），是用来计算部件失效概率的常用参数，但由于关键安全部件可能在平均故障间隔时间之前出现故障，因此，该参数的传统计算方法对于单点失效概率的分析并不适用。提出评价单点失效概率的分析方法，即基于所给出数据样本量的大小，提出了评价单点失效概率的计算公式。给出了两个案例来进一步验证所提方法的有效性。

关键词: 单点失效, MTBF, 概率, 安全性评估

Abstract:

Safety is the lifeline of civil aviation industry. The regulations proposed by airworthiness authorities require that the occurrence of any single failure which would prevent continuous safe flight and landing of airplanes is extremely improbable. While the ambiguous description makes it difficult to calculate the occurrence of single failure in practice. The traditional parameter, mean time between failure(MTBF), is not suitable for single failure analysis due to the possibility that critical safety components may fail before MTBF. A method is proposed to evaluate the probability of single failure. The evaluating formula for the occurrence probability of single failure basing on sample size is given. Practical cases are used to verify the effectiveness of this method.

Key words: single failure, MTBF, probability, safety assessment

中图分类号:

V240.2

杨可，赵长啸. 民用飞机安全性分析中单点失效MTBF 的算法[J]. taptap下载安装安卓学报.

YANG Ke, ZHAO Changxiao. Single failure MTBF analysis on aircraft safety assessment[J]. .

参考文献

[1] HEWITT J, PHAMJ. Quantitative Risk Assessment Enhances Customer TrustinAviation[C]//ReliabilityandMaintainabilitySymposium(RAMS),2014 Annual. IEEE, 2014：1-6.

[2] ZHU Y, ZHANG J, GONG Q, et al. Reliability and Safety Assessment with AltaRica for Complex Aircraft Systems[C]//Reliability, Maintainability and Safety(ICRMS）, 2011 9th International Conference on. IEEE,2011：588-593.

[3] YANG J, HUANG H Z, HE L P, et al. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2011, 18(8): 2084-2092.

[4] LIU C B. Aircraft Fuel Tank System Fire Disaster Analysis based on FMEA and FTA[C]//QR2MSE 2013, IEEE Computer Society, IEEE,2013.

[5] MYERS ALBERT, RAUZY ANTOINE. Efficient reliability assessment of redundant systems subject to imperfect fault coverage using binary decision diagrams[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2008, 57(2):336-348.

[6] KERLUND O, BIEBER P, B EDE E, et al. ISAAC, a Framework for Integrated Safety Analysis of Functional[C]//Geometrical and Human Aspects, in 3rd European Congress on Embedded Real Time Systems(ERTS). Toulouse, France, 2006.

[7] LISAGOR O. A Pragmatic Approach[D]. York: The University of York,2010.

[8] ZHAO C X, CHEN Y, WANG H L, et al. Reliability analysis of aircraft condition monitoring network using an enhanced BDD algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2012, 25(6):925-930.

[9] FAA. Arsenal Version of AC1309(draft）, System Design and Analysis[S]. America：Federal Aviation Administration, 2002.

[10] YUNWY, PARK GOEUN, HAN Y J. An optimal reliability and maintainability design of a searching system[J]. CommunicationsinStatistics: Simulation and Computation, 2014, 43(8):1959-1978.

[11] ZANIN M. Network analysis reveals patterns behind air safety events[J].Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2014, 401: 201-206.

[12] SAE. APR4761, Guidelines and Methods for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Systems and Equipments[S]. America: The Engineering Society For Advancing Mobility Land Sea Air and Space, 1996.