基于本体的机场安全热点特征分析方法

taptap下载安装安卓学报

基于本体的机场安全热点特征分析方法

王洁宁¹，赵晓鹏¹，周沅²

（1.taptap下载安装安卓天津市空管运行规划与安全技术重点实验室，天津300300；2.民航华东地区空管局，上海200335）

收稿日期:2015-11-27 修回日期:2015-12-31 出版日期:2016-08-26 发布日期:2016-10-13
作者简介:王洁宁（1966—），男，甘肃兰州人，研究员，博士，研究方向为空管运行安全及空管系统仿真.
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项（3122013P008，3122014P040）；国家空管委基金项目（GKG201410003）

Ontology-based approach for airdrome safety hotspots analysis

WANG Jiening¹, ZHAO Xiaopeng¹, ZHOU Yuan²

(1. Tianjin Key Lab of ATM Operation Planning and Safety Techniques, CAUC, Tianjin 300300, China;2. Air Traffic Control Bureau of East China, Shanghai 200335, China)

Received:2015-11-27 Revised:2015-12-31 Online:2016-08-26 Published:2016-10-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对民用机场热点特征识别与分类需求，在Protege中构建机场热点的顶层概念框架并描述逻辑（DLs）表达，引入对机场安全热点在不同层面形式化的描述，建立机场安全热点领域本体，以FaCT++推理机将热点按不同特征分类推理。该方法的意义在于为机场热点特征识别信息化和热点分类协同工作的全过程提供了一定的语义支撑袁管制员可以直观、全面地掌握热点区域状况。

关键词: 机场安全热点, 顶层概念, 领域本体, FaCT++, 热点分类

Abstract:

According to the demands for characteristics identification and classification of civil airdrome hotspots, the toplevel concept framework of hotspots is built using with Protege tool, the core terminology is validated by descriptive logics, introducing formalized description of airport safety hot spots at different levels. A domain ontology is established, in which hotspots are classified in accordance with features based on FaCT++. This approach has benefits on common knowledge construction of airport hotspots identification and classification. It can also help controllers to know hotspots' risk level directly and completely.

Key words: airdrome safety hotspots, top-level concept, domain ontology, FaCT++, hotspots classification

中图分类号:

X949
V351

王洁宁，赵晓鹏，周沅. 基于本体的机场安全热点特征分析方法[J]. taptap下载安装安卓学报.

WANG Jiening, ZHAO Xiaopeng, ZHOU Yuan. Ontology-based approach for airdrome safety hotspots analysis[J]. .

参考文献

[1] ICAO. Procedures for Air Navigation Service-Air Traffic Management，Doc 4444-ATM/501[S]. Montreal：ICAO，2007.

[2] 中国民用航空局. 国内资料汇编[G].北京：中国民用航空局, 2012.

[3] 霍志勤.机场热点区域三选法研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(3): 92-96.

[4] 夏正洪,潘卫军, 康瑞, 等. 机场冲突热点识别与等级划分方法研究[J].科学技术与工程, 2014, 14(21): 297-301.

[5] FAA. Computer Testing Supplement for Airline Transport Pilot and Aircraft Dispatcher[EB/OL]. [2015-11-20]. http：//www.faa.gov/trainingtesting/testing/test_questions/media/FAA-CT-8080-7c.pdf.

[6] ANDREW T F, TIMOTHY P W, SHERRY B. Relating Airport Surface Collision Potential to Taxiway Geometry and Traffic Flow[C]//14th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Atlanta，GA，2014：1-18.

[7] South African Civil Aviation Authority. Runway Incursions [EB/OL].[2015-11-20]. http：//www.caa.co.za/Safety%20Seminars%20Presentations/Runway%20Incursions.pdf.

[8] Government of India, Office of the Director General of Civil Aviation.Runway Safety Programme and Formation of Runway Safety Teams[EB/OL]. [2015-11-20].http：//dgca.nic.in/cars/D4X-X4.pdf.

[9] BORST W N. Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse[D]. Enschede: Twente University, 1997.

[10] 李景, 钱平, 苏晓鹭. 构建领域本体的方法[J]. 计算机与农业,2003(7): 7-10.

[11] PEREZ A G, BENJAMINS V R. Overview of Knowledge Sharing and Reuse ComponentsL Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods[C]//Pro-ceedings of the IJCAI-99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem Solving Methods(KRR5). Stockholm, Sweden, 1999.

[12] 李薇. 基于本体的知识组织问题研究[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学,2007: 6-7.

[13] MRAZOVA M. Runway incursions-clear and constant danger[J]. Incas Bulletin, 2014, 6(3): 71-80.

[14] 李振福. 北极航线问题的鱼骨图分析及应用研究[J]. 航海技术,2010(1): 2-4.

[15] KR TZSCH M，SIMAN C K F，HORROCKS I. A Description Logic Primer[D]. Oxford: University of Oxford, 2013: 1-17.

[16] TSARKOV D, HORROCKS I. FaCT++ Description Logic Reasoner：SystemDescription [D].Manchester:TheUniversityofManchester,2006:1-5.

[17] SCH NEFELD J, M LLER D P F. Runway incursion prevention systems: A review of runway incursion avoidance and altering system approaches[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2012, 51(3): 31-49.